I have insight into the heart of evil, because, although, by the grace of God, I have been spared from an upbringing that would immerse me into the culture which would feed into it, I am, to a large extent, cut from the same cloth.

When a predator sees a grass eater, its instinct is to sneak up on it, tear its jugular, rip it limb from limb and consume it.

Now, we, as human beings, were designed to be predators. We have eyes on the front of our heads. We have digestive systems that can process meat. We have brains that operate more efficiently when we eat flesh. We were meant to hunt things, and tear flesh from bone. This is what we are. People can subsist on vegetables and be perfectly healthy, but in order to do so, they must eat a very wide variety of vegetables to get all the same nutrients; nutrients that we can get wholesale by eating raw meat (cooking meat damages its nutritional value, although it does kill anything it may be infested with).

I don’t say this to attempt to refute vegetarianism, which can be made to work, but merely to point out that, biologically, that is not what we are designed (evolved and/or created) to be.

All of that having been said, over time, civilization has successfully bred out the predator instinct from a large portion (the majority, I would say) of the population. We have relinquished our predator instinct in favor of a herd mentality. Rather than focusing on developing a relationship with a few strong people and subsisting by consuming the weakness out of the herd, our nature has been inverted to seek validation, comfort, and protection in large groups — the psychology of the herd; the grass-eater.

For those of us that are left, who have not succumbed to this, who are still capable of thinking for ourselves (another attribute associated with the predator-individualist), there is a strong psychological tension at work.

We see our fellow human beings, and we experience, on the one hand, a human fellowship, yet, on the other hand, we perceive in them (in their attitudes, values, philosophy, and psychology) the nature of herd.

We experience desires that offend our conscientious natures.

But those that fall prey to their desire to eat their fellow human beings ultimately becoming something else, entirely — they lose the predatory nature, and become parasites.

The nature of the predator is to take out the weak. This strengthens the herd. In corporate America, the healthy predator will frequently be in a managerial/executive position. If they are not, then they frequently experience alienation and frustration, since their coworkers will tend to have more of a herd mentality, which will be completely foreign to them.

The nature of the parasite is to take out the strong. Why? Because they have become accustomed to people willfully feeding themselves to them via the various fraudulent systems they’ve designed, and the self-confident, and intellectually independent strong (i.e., the predators) pose a direct threat to that system, which enables them to continue to enjoy a position on the top of the human food chain without having to work for it, or be worthy of it.

The entire system is unnatural, twisted, and unjust, and it undermines the viability of the human race by promoting weakness and the herd mentality. It is disgusting to independent thinker — as well it should be — and it is enabled by the philosophy of the city; the system whereby we huddle together into vast population centers until we are piled on top of each other like sheep around a shepherd; instead of being the rural, land-owning entrepreneurs we are supposed to be.

Do you hate Wal-Mart, Monsanto, MTV, and all of these unnaturally huge corporations that are making us weak and stupid?

I blame the herd mentality.


People are very quick to throw this word around.

It really amounts to an ad hominem attack.  It is seen as inherently pejorative; and perhaps rightly so, and it is frequently thrown around quickly and (as in my case) inaccurately.

This same guy later deleted one of my posts, which had been both polite and on subject in a different thread.

Retaliation much?


alexjonesEditorial by Mark I Rasskazov, Editor in Chief.

Mr. Jones,

Listening to The Alex Jones Show has been my guilty pleasure for some time now, and I have to say, I am feeling less and less guilty about it all the time.  Truth be told, while I do not think that you ever lie, I do think that you do engage in hyperbole from time to time.  That having been said, I find that you are by far the boldest, most vocal, and most consistent voice of freedom in the media today — even including such inveterate luminaries such as Leonard Peikoff, Ron Paul, Charles Koch, and others.  When you were on The Piers Morgan Show, I must admit that I was put off by the way you approached him — yet, in retrospect, that exchange, on a subconscious level, has given me permission to be much more vocal and assertive about my own beliefs.  I am in your debt for that.

One belief, in particular, which we share in common, is that a universal federal gun registry will lead to the end of America as we know her.  I have remained silent about the creeping tyranny in the United States for years, rationalizing that the people get the government that they deserve — which is something which I still believe to a large extent.  However, in spite of this fact, in the interests of preserving liberty for myself and my family, it has become necessary to express with all vociferousness that we will not abide further encroachments to our individual liberties — to those rights which follow from the principle of self-ownership in general, and to our right to bear arms in particular.

While I may not agree with you all of the time, I hereby recognize you as a credible voice for human freedom, and I count myself to be with you all the way until we have taken our government back from the tyrants.

Take heart.  Take power.  Rise above.

Very respectfully,

Mark Ivanovich Rasskazov


I think when the moneyed interests go to Hell, their punishment will be to have to listen to the album «Amaryllis» by Shinedown over and over again, knowing that they were the ones who tried to suppress the message it blasts out front and center.


«The hardest thing to explain is the glaringly evident which everyone has decided not to see.»

I think that this, to a large extent, encapsulates my purpose, here.

What you refuse to see, I will lay out in such a way that it cannot be misunderstood, and I will relentlessly pusue the logical ends to which such things point.

This is my solemn promise to you, the reader.