THE RIGHTEOUS PREDATOR

I have insight into the heart of evil, because, although, by the grace of God, I have been spared from an upbringing that would immerse me into the culture which would feed into it, I am, to a large extent, cut from the same cloth.

When a predator sees a grass eater, its instinct is to sneak up on it, tear its jugular, rip it limb from limb and consume it.

Now, we, as human beings, were designed to be predators. We have eyes on the front of our heads. We have digestive systems that can process meat. We have brains that operate more efficiently when we eat flesh. We were meant to hunt things, and tear flesh from bone. This is what we are. People can subsist on vegetables and be perfectly healthy, but in order to do so, they must eat a very wide variety of vegetables to get all the same nutrients; nutrients that we can get wholesale by eating raw meat (cooking meat damages its nutritional value, although it does kill anything it may be infested with).

I don’t say this to attempt to refute vegetarianism, which can be made to work, but merely to point out that, biologically, that is not what we are designed (evolved and/or created) to be.

All of that having been said, over time, civilization has successfully bred out the predator instinct from a large portion (the majority, I would say) of the population. We have relinquished our predator instinct in favor of a herd mentality. Rather than focusing on developing a relationship with a few strong people and subsisting by consuming the weakness out of the herd, our nature has been inverted to seek validation, comfort, and protection in large groups — the psychology of the herd; the grass-eater.

For those of us that are left, who have not succumbed to this, who are still capable of thinking for ourselves (another attribute associated with the predator-individualist), there is a strong psychological tension at work.

We see our fellow human beings, and we experience, on the one hand, a human fellowship, yet, on the other hand, we perceive in them (in their attitudes, values, philosophy, and psychology) the nature of herd.

We experience desires that offend our conscientious natures.

But those that fall prey to their desire to eat their fellow human beings ultimately becoming something else, entirely — they lose the predatory nature, and become parasites.

The nature of the predator is to take out the weak. This strengthens the herd. In corporate America, the healthy predator will frequently be in a managerial/executive position. If they are not, then they frequently experience alienation and frustration, since their coworkers will tend to have more of a herd mentality, which will be completely foreign to them.

The nature of the parasite is to take out the strong. Why? Because they have become accustomed to people willfully feeding themselves to them via the various fraudulent systems they’ve designed, and the self-confident, and intellectually independent strong (i.e., the predators) pose a direct threat to that system, which enables them to continue to enjoy a position on the top of the human food chain without having to work for it, or be worthy of it.

The entire system is unnatural, twisted, and unjust, and it undermines the viability of the human race by promoting weakness and the herd mentality. It is disgusting to independent thinker — as well it should be — and it is enabled by the philosophy of the city; the system whereby we huddle together into vast population centers until we are piled on top of each other like sheep around a shepherd; instead of being the rural, land-owning entrepreneurs we are supposed to be.

Do you hate Wal-Mart, Monsanto, MTV, and all of these unnaturally huge corporations that are making us weak and stupid?

I blame the herd mentality.

TDJ SING-ALONG: MAMA ECONOMY — THE ECONOMY EXPLAINED (TAYZONDAY AND LINDSEYSTOMP)

Editorial by Mark I Rasskazov.

This song is part of a series, which I periodically update (when I feel like it), which I call the «TDJ SING-ALONG;» a series of commentaries about songs I find appealing, and which help me illustrate the Transegoist ideology.  Sing along if you know the words!

This particular installment was brought to my attention by PJ Cornell (contributor; writes music reviews on this site), who was made aware of it by one Christopher Sperandio; Transegoist sympathizer and enigmatic New York socialite.  It is a delightful, Barenaked Ladiesesque little tune with some incredibly brilliant, insightful, and densely informative lyrics.

Tay-Zonday-Mama-Economy

TAYZONDAY & LINDSEYSTOMP — MAMA ECONOMY: THE ECONOMY EXPLAINED

Are you confused about the US economy?  Well have no fear!  I’m going to explain the American economy right now:

The dollar: just think of it like a promise from the government;
But the value of the dollar has to be there to be relevant.
The value of the dollar comes from China and Iran (!)
When they put their cash reserves in a U.S. dollar plan;

(Yep!  China and Iran.  How ’bout that?)

They buy treasury bonds from the Federal Reserve.
We say “we owe you extra money ’cause you gave us some of yours.”
And that’s a big part of the National Debt:
All the interest that we haven’t paid to China quite yet;

(Consider: how are we to ever pay off interest on «loans» that are taken out on the US Dollar itself?!  This is a scam.  It’s self-perpetuating debt.)

And a hundred other countries ’cause we’re such a good investment
The whole world gives us money; we say “Hey we’ll pay you interest!”
This is how money is created from air: bank bailouts, federal budgets;
Money isn’t really there!

(We’re suckers — and, ultimately, so is anyone who invests in the dollar.  The banking cartels are scamming the entire world.)

It’s an I.O.U., remember dollars are a promise; when you borrow from a bank,
It’s not from other depositors; the money for your loan gets created on the spot.
Then they put it in your name,
Gamble on your life and body.

(I’m roulette number 23/Red.  You?)

But if you lose your job then you were a bad bet.
(Whoops!)
If a million lose their jobs, then we have a recession
(Hello?)
Here’s the dirty secret: your labor’s too expensive!
(Compared to the Chinese?  You bet!!)
Wall Street wants you spending money but they never want to pay you.
(Redistribution, anyone?!)

In your life cash and credit: they are very different things.
(Usually you use one or the other, I’ve noticed.)
But your credit’s someone else’s cash once it leaves your name.
(I will gladly pay you tomorrow for a hamburger today.)
This is why money is debt, and your debt is good for Wall Street prosperity,
(Gravy, baby!)
And economic growth since the 1970s Is consumers getting credit without wages increasing.
(If you really want to get your mind boggled, look at how much these banks can lend out per dollar in cash reserves.)

So when they talk about the housing crisis they never say we need to lower housing prices;
We need better devices to afford high prices;
(Wait a sec…how did the stock market crash to begin with, again?)
Meaning higher debt — lower interest; ’cause you’re underpaid to begin with.
(Don’t worry; keep borrowing!)
That’s the cycle we’re in; we don’t understand, so all we can do is question:
(One would hope.)

Mama economy make me understand
All the numbers why Daddy’s on a welfare plan?
Turnin’ thirty, forty, fifty — gotta move in with my parents,
And the stocks go up, but the jobs disappear.

Because wages barely grew for 40 years: when you buy stuff,
They delay the cost of ownership
.
You can’t afford it, so they make it to depend
On endless small transactions which is more like renting.  

(What does your life lease for?)

You pay more for printer ink than you do for gold,
(Get refillable cartridges or pay out the @$$.)
And more for bottled water than you do for oil.
(Get a ProPur — it’s better for you than bottled water, anyway.)
Razor blades are made to oxidate, (!)
So you’re forever in debt to them just to shave.
(Whatever happened to straight razors?)

It’s a type of socialism called «market socialism.»
(Calling it like it is!)
The best designed product meets a need and doesn’t last.
(«Best» is a point of view, really.)
We subsidize waste with landfills and holidays like Earth Day,
Teachin’ kids: «recycle please.»

(Oh, the irony.)

Kids won’t learn in school we live one worldview;
(YOU VIL ZINK VAT VE ZAY!)
 Neoliberal economics in all of our politics.
(Neoliberalism!  Like Classical Liberalism, except, um, not at all like Classical Liberalism…It’s new and improved!!)
They don’t ask why corporations are human citizens,
(In point of fact, I don’t remember that coming up in class at all.  Do you?)
Or why grandma pays more taxes ’cause she lacks stock dividends.
(Granny’s gonna have to take one for the team.  And by «team,» I mean Mr. Rockefeller.)

Or why private bankers print the public money, (!!)
Or why democracy is broken: ‘cause their leaders won’t be cutting
Loopholes or subsidies for constituent industries,
(Constituent industries.  Geezus.)
Putting legislative bodies in a deep freeze.
(Fire your congressman; he doesn’t work for you.)

So the Ph.Ds and the G.E.D.s cry with Ayn Rand down at the temp agency,
Sayin’ “We believed in meritocracy, but there’s more to the story – someone answer me!»

Ingenious couple of lines, here at the end.  He invokes Ayn Rand.  If you don’t know who that is, you need to figure it out immediately (click the link attached to the name to get started).  She is the most controversial figure in the history of philosophy, and the controversy has no sign of doing anything other than getting more intense.  The thing is, she has been the most compelling proponent of Free Market Capitalism in the history of the world, clarifying it’s ethical aspects much further than any philosopher before her — and she integrated it into her comprehensive philosophy, called «Objectivism.»

Here’s the thing: her detractors (and many of her more ignorant supporters) associate her with the current US economic system, and commit a genetic fallacy, lumping her ideas with the multitude of injustices built into our economic system, whereas, if you read her book, Capitalism the Unknown Ideal, she, along with some other Objectivist authors (including, at the time, Alan Greenspan — no longer an Objectivist in good standing) more or less jumped up and down with their hair on fire about the dangers of the private fiat system that, she, even then, was able to see would destroy private wealth in America.

Consider the gall of the anti-free market crowd who have helped set up the market-socialist system, and then blame it on Ayn Rand when things go sour.  Incredible.

Ayn Rand crying at the Temp Agency.  Simply brilliant.

Wake up and understand that you are living in a system designed to destroy your wealth so that you become dependent on the government.

AMARYLLIS

I think when the moneyed interests go to Hell, their punishment will be to have to listen to the album «Amaryllis» by Shinedown over and over again, knowing that they were the ones who tried to suppress the message it blasts out front and center.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fGwnmB47pnM

MONEY-POWER

Money and power are inherently related.  This is common knowledge.  What is not common knowledge is the reason why this is the case.  And the reason this is the case is quite simple.

Power is the ability to exert influence over how others choose to expend their time, effort, and resources.

Money is an accepted, demarcated representation of time, effort, and resources.

Ergo, money and power relate to one another on a directly proportional basis.  An amount of money is a strong indicator of power, as well as being a source for the same.

An indicator: because, under normal circumstances, money is acquired by being able to constructively guide (or influence) human action.

A source: because it amounts to a direct means of accomplishing the same.

An insidious implication: when money stolen (or redistributed, which amounts to the same thing; subject of a future post), what is actually occuring is not merely theft, but also enslavement; because you are taking by force that which legitimately represents the time, effort, and resources of other people.

Contrast this to trade, which amounts to an agreement of equivalency; i.e., an agreement that a certain amount of time and effort on the part of one party, is equivalent in value to a different amount of time and effort on the part of another.

Tangential conclusion: people say that Capitalism is injust, and distributes income inequitably.

The former is not true; because the system in its strict sense, allows only for such economic relationships which each party (legitimately) in question is willing to voluntarilly agree to.

The latter is a partial truth: not everyone is «equal» in a capitalist system.  This is, for the most part, a function of the fact that not all people are equal.  Some are smarter.  Some are harder working.  Some have unique talents.  Some people seem to think this is unfair.  Such an attitude is not merely petty and resentful, but also counterconstructive.  These people should be thankful that these people are so much smarter, hard-working, talented, and wealthy than them, because this enables them to create a world that is much more pleasant to live in for everyone; they are able to do this because they understand how to allocate themselves and their resources.  If the socialists had their way, these people would be severely handicapped and we’d all suffer for it.

Caveat to the tangential conclusion: we do not live in a Capitalist society.  We live in a Fascist society.  If you do not understand the distinction (and many do not), then don’t worry; I will clarify it in a future post.