THE RIGHTEOUS PREDATOR

I have insight into the heart of evil, because, although, by the grace of God, I have been spared from an upbringing that would immerse me into the culture which would feed into it, I am, to a large extent, cut from the same cloth.

When a predator sees a grass eater, its instinct is to sneak up on it, tear its jugular, rip it limb from limb and consume it.

Now, we, as human beings, were designed to be predators. We have eyes on the front of our heads. We have digestive systems that can process meat. We have brains that operate more efficiently when we eat flesh. We were meant to hunt things, and tear flesh from bone. This is what we are. People can subsist on vegetables and be perfectly healthy, but in order to do so, they must eat a very wide variety of vegetables to get all the same nutrients; nutrients that we can get wholesale by eating raw meat (cooking meat damages its nutritional value, although it does kill anything it may be infested with).

I don’t say this to attempt to refute vegetarianism, which can be made to work, but merely to point out that, biologically, that is not what we are designed (evolved and/or created) to be.

All of that having been said, over time, civilization has successfully bred out the predator instinct from a large portion (the majority, I would say) of the population. We have relinquished our predator instinct in favor of a herd mentality. Rather than focusing on developing a relationship with a few strong people and subsisting by consuming the weakness out of the herd, our nature has been inverted to seek validation, comfort, and protection in large groups — the psychology of the herd; the grass-eater.

For those of us that are left, who have not succumbed to this, who are still capable of thinking for ourselves (another attribute associated with the predator-individualist), there is a strong psychological tension at work.

We see our fellow human beings, and we experience, on the one hand, a human fellowship, yet, on the other hand, we perceive in them (in their attitudes, values, philosophy, and psychology) the nature of herd.

We experience desires that offend our conscientious natures.

But those that fall prey to their desire to eat their fellow human beings ultimately becoming something else, entirely — they lose the predatory nature, and become parasites.

The nature of the predator is to take out the weak. This strengthens the herd. In corporate America, the healthy predator will frequently be in a managerial/executive position. If they are not, then they frequently experience alienation and frustration, since their coworkers will tend to have more of a herd mentality, which will be completely foreign to them.

The nature of the parasite is to take out the strong. Why? Because they have become accustomed to people willfully feeding themselves to them via the various fraudulent systems they’ve designed, and the self-confident, and intellectually independent strong (i.e., the predators) pose a direct threat to that system, which enables them to continue to enjoy a position on the top of the human food chain without having to work for it, or be worthy of it.

The entire system is unnatural, twisted, and unjust, and it undermines the viability of the human race by promoting weakness and the herd mentality. It is disgusting to independent thinker — as well it should be — and it is enabled by the philosophy of the city; the system whereby we huddle together into vast population centers until we are piled on top of each other like sheep around a shepherd; instead of being the rural, land-owning entrepreneurs we are supposed to be.

Do you hate Wal-Mart, Monsanto, MTV, and all of these unnaturally huge corporations that are making us weak and stupid?

I blame the herd mentality.

OBAMA-CARE DEATH PANELS WILL TARGET CIGARETTE SMOKERS

smokerArticle by Turner Bird Cox.

Syndicated from Thin Red Line News.

Cigarette smokers will have to pay much higher premiums for health care under the Affordable Health Care for America Act (a.k.a., «Obama-Care»), and may become the main focus of Obama-Care’s «End of Life Care Panels» (a.k.a., «Death Panels») to put a majority of smokers on anti-depressants or SSRIs.  First, cigarette smokers will be given higher Obama-Care premiums which will give the doctor an opportunity to prescribe anti-depressants or SSRIs.  Anti-Depressants or SSRIs change the chemistry of your brain and can have side-effects if you stop taking them. The idea is to never take them.

The questions are, how many cigarette smokers will quit and how many seek medical help, and how many cigarette smokers will resort to anti-depressants as they quit smoking? The FDA has developed an acronym called (SAD), or «Seasonal Affective Disorder,» and now prescribe anti-depressants for people experiencing depression when the seasons change. The FDA is looking for any way possible to prescribe every person an anti-depressant.

Furthermore, cigarette smokers will have to prove that they have quit smoking.  A simple hair test can show signs of smoking up to 90 days; in some cases as much as up to a year.

Finally, you cannot own a gun because you have used anti-depressants and are mentally unstable. Obama-Care will apply the same concepts to any «unhealthy» item such as soda, alcohol, and marijuana.  The government will tell you what you can and can’t eat while forcing you to pay for it.

PHILOSOPHY FORUMS’ PHOBIA OF ORIGINAL THOUGHT

2656043491_86083bceffEditorial by Mark I Rasskazov, Editor in Chief.

I’m getting pretty tired of my comments being deleted «for being of low quality,» on the Philosophy Forums website, which is catch-all for «I just don’t like what you have to say.»  So I think it’s time to start documenting when I’m being silenced.  They have the right to act upon their phobia of original thought on their site, and I have the right to point it out when it happens.  I’m going start doing exactly that.

On Atticus II’s post entitled «Consciousness,» he writes:

«The concept is that there is a state of being aware, an awareness of being. Consciousness.  What we know about the brain is that it has developed through a long environmental and social struggle, to anticipate the future, maximize return on effort and minimize the risk and costs.  Why do people associate consciousness with a sense of self when it is more likely that the state and sense of arousal and alertness is predicted to be a necessity for our survival and to avoid our human stupidity?  If I look in the mirror there’s a face I recognize as my own, consciousness has no mirror and no concept of self or authenticity to begin with so how can it extract identity from actions, thoughts and emotions? How can it be self-awareness if it has no recognizable features?  Consciousness has an ecocentric basis even though it can be manipulated to seem egocentric, in any way people choose.»

I responded:

«I experience values, which manifest intentionality.  I take this to be evidence of the existence of my self.»

Is it a treatise?  No.  It is simple and succinct.  But it is also relevant and cogent.  It is not «of low quality.»

This post was deleted by the admin user, «Ying» for being «of low quality.»

This is the eighth comment of mine that has been deleted so far.  I do feel that I am being singled out, and I will be keeping a running tally of every comment of mine that is deleted from now on.

I enjoy making new friends — but failing that, I love a good fight, provided I have a good cause.  And this is is an excellent cause.

FASCIST!!

People are very quick to throw this word around.

It really amounts to an ad hominem attack.  It is seen as inherently pejorative; and perhaps rightly so, and it is frequently thrown around quickly and (as in my case) inaccurately.

http://forums.philosophyforums.com/threads/introducing-transegoism-59732.html

This same guy later deleted one of my posts, which had been both polite and on subject in a different thread.

Retaliation much?

DON’T TAKE SHIT. EVER.

If you put yourself in the position being humble and genuinely willing to learn, then the group will subconsciously, yet inexorably push you to stay in such a situation.  Furthermore, they will identify you as the group scapegoat.  All shortcomings of the group will be ATTRIBUTED TO YOU.  If you don’t want to get shit, then don’t take shit.

And God help you if you happen to be the smart one of the group.  They won’t understand your ideas, so they’ll break them into shards and shank you with the pieces.  Before you share ideas with any group, you should first find out what peoples’ weaknesses and insecurities are — so that when they do lash out at you for being smarter than them, you have all the ammunition you need to destroy their fragile little self-esteems.

They will not realize how deeply hypocritical and insecure they are being.  They will admonish you to be more humble and more willing to accept advice — even as they continue to pile on the shit.  Therefore, if anyone tries that kind of bullshit on you, you throw it back in their face IMMEDIATELY.  Don’t be afraid to be brutal in your verbal abuse — regardless of how «gently» they seem to be poking at you.  If they are poking at you gently, it is because they are testing you.  Fuck.  Them.  Up.